 |  |
I don't like to add footnotes unless really necessary as it feels condescending to explain things people already know... but in the end I realised I needed one for the first panel on page 35. Non-British and even younger Brits in my small sample didn't get what that sentence meant, so I've just added a note about public houses.
Holding himself had a few footnotes in his own text - something about history of the CTC (Cyclists Touring Club), the source for his tent poles being a fishing rod maker in Cheltenham, that sort of thing.
But perhaps he only added these as footnotes because he was typing on a typewriter? Maybe I can and should just include them in the relevant panels, and avoid any confusion that way between min and his!
Mine are being added in purple to differentiate, but I don't think it does the job. Alternatively I could use numbers for mine, and asterisks for his? There aren't very many of either his or mine, anyway...
Holding himself had a few footnotes in his own text - something about history of the CTC (Cyclists Touring Club), the source for his tent poles being a fishing rod maker in Cheltenham, that sort of thing.
But perhaps he only added these as footnotes because he was typing on a typewriter? Maybe I can and should just include them in the relevant panels, and avoid any confusion that way between min and his!
Mine are being added in purple to differentiate, but I don't think it does the job. Alternatively I could use numbers for mine, and asterisks for his? There aren't very many of either his or mine, anyway...
RSS Feed
